1. In accordance with the principal claim that the court changed on an exchange basis, the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) is the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On February 23, 1984, Plaintiff B, a mining business entity, purchased from the Defendant the amount of KRW 900,000 out of the forest land in Namnam-gun, Namnam-gun, the Defendant owned at KRW 3 million and jointly used the existing road leading to the mine purchased as above, and the extension and repair of the road are responsible by Plaintiff B.

B. On July 18, 1995, the said forest was divided into 2,175,775 square meters of F forest (on several occasions, the present area is 1,875,426 square meters of forest, and on February 4, 2014, when the area was 1,882,172 square meters of forest and G forest (hereinafter “H”) and 30,083 square meters of forest and field (hereinafter “H”), and around that time, the registration of ownership transfer was completed in the Plaintiffs’ name.

As a result of the above division, I completely surrounded H owned by the plaintiffs as follows:

C. The Plaintiffs, from February 1984, before the division of the F Forest of the Y in the Jeonnam-gun, used the part No. 3,157 square meters in the attached Form No. 1 as H access road with a mine factory, etc., and the part No. 3,354 square meters in the attached Form No. 2. 3,354 square meters in the attached Form No. 1 as supplementary facilities, etc., from February 1, 1984, before the division of the H and the part No. 3,157 square meters in the part after the division.

On April 23, 2013, the Plaintiffs filed a lawsuit seeking the implementation of the procedure for the registration of ownership transfer on the ground of the completion of the prescription period for the acquisition of ownership on the ground of the sales contract on February 23, 1984 with respect to the part (B) of the attached Table 3,354 square meters on the part (B), which was used as an ancillary facility, against the Defendant, as indicated in the “Biju District Court’s Maritime District Court’s 2013Gadan20240), which was in progress on March 27, 2014, between the Plaintiffs and the Defendant, as indicated in the “Reconciliation Decision 4.”

The "attached appraisal sheet" stated in the above decision of the Reconciliation Recommendation shall be in attached Form.

2. The same shall apply to drawings;

E. In addition, pursuant to paragraph 1 of the above decision of recommending reconciliation, between the plaintiffs and the defendant.