logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2014.09.25 2014고합74
영리유인등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant operated a salt farm with the trade name of “E salt farm” in two places, including Jeonnam-gun, Shinan-gun (16,347 square meters) and D (14,248 square meters). From February 2007, the victim F was from around February 2007, the victim G was employed as a salt farm employee from around January 2010, and the victim H was employed as a salt farm employee in the Defendant’s salt farm from around October 2012. The victims were lower than the general public to the extent that they could not exercise their right to claim wages.

1. On February 207, when the Defendant was seeking a salt farm employee to work in the Defendant’s salt farm, the Defendant was placed in the Defendant’s house located in the Nanannam-gun I, Nanannam-gun, and was placed in the Defendant’s house located in the Defendant’s seat, and when the Defendant was placed in the Defendant’s house located in the Defendant’s home located in the name-free box, the Defendant had the victim do work in the salt farm with his own control and had the victim do work in the salt farm and had the victim do not pay wages normally, and the Defendant had the victim not pay wages normally. The Defendant “It is better that our house is superior to that of other salt farms, and if it would give three million won each year, and if it is well doing work, the wage will be added.” From that time to March 18, 2014.

Accordingly, the Defendant induced the victim for profit from February 2007 to March 18, 2014.

2. Based on the fact that the victims do not exercise their right to claim wages due to lack of their intellectual and historical ability compared to the general public, the quasi-Fraud Defendant committed an act as if the victims did not have the intent or ability to pay normal wages to the victims, and had them work in the salt farm operated by them and had them take the work.

On February 2007, the quasi-Fraud defendant against the victim F is better than the victim's house in the defendant's house, "at the defendant's house," and is better than the other salt farms.

arrow