beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.
Of the facts charged of this case, interference with business and damage to property shall be acquitted.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant, from January 201, 201, was directly operated by the Defendant, following the Defendant’s father G, with a mutual salt farm called “F salt farm” in the Jeon-nam-gun, Nannam-gun.
1. Around July 2007, the Defendant: (a) accessed the victim I (the 44 years of age) who lacks intellectual ability with a view to making a profit by getting the victim I (the 44 years of age) to work as a salt farm; (b) and (c) removed the victim who lacks mental ability to do so from the Y of the Mapo-si, Mapo-si; and (d) removed the victim from the Mapo-si terminal of the Mapo-si to the Mapo-si passenger ship with a zero percent of the daily rate; and (c) removed the victim from the time on February 9, 2014 through the Mapo-si, the Mapo-si, the Mapo-si: (a) induced the victim to take labor by having the victim do work at the Mapo-si; and (b) induced the victim for profit
2. Quasi-Fraud Defendant 1, using the fact that the victim I and C lack of intellectual ability and judgment ability, did not normally exercise the right to claim wages, committed as if the victims did not have the intent or ability to pay normal wages, and had the victims do work in the salt farm operated by the victim and take the work into consideration the labor force.
On February 2, 2011, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim I, stating, “The monthly salary to be given topat will be put in through the passbook.”
Therefore, the Defendant did not pay the victim wages of KRW 662,503 (Calculation of the minimum wage amount publicly announced by the Ministry of Employment and Labor) to the victim on February 9, 2011 after having the victim work as a salt farm employee producing salt from his/her salt farm, and did not pay from that time to February 9, 2014 the total amount of wages of KRW 37,582,912, as shown in [Attachment 1]-1 to 37, as stated in [Attachment 37]-2, 2014.
As a result, the defendant committed a crime to the victim by using the mental disorder of the victim.