The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is as follows: (a) the Defendant obtained the victim E’s goods transaction approval from the D iron shop operated by C in the Gyeonggi-do around March 2016 to April, 2016; (b) the Defendant obtained the victim E’s goods transaction approval from C; and (c) the victim “the victim is a fraudulent change” from the victim’s “F,” “F,” who is a bad person, who is engaged in the same kind of industry as the lower-party goods, in the gold-dong address at the time of the government around August 2016.

“Publicly insulting the victim.”

2. The grounds for dismissing the public prosecution of this case are the crimes falling under Article 311 of the Criminal Act, which can be prosecuted only when the victim files a complaint pursuant to Article 312(1) of the Criminal Act. According to a written agreement bound in the records of public trial, it can be recognized that the victim E cancels the complaint against the defendant on November 15, 2016, which is after the prosecution of this case. Thus, the public prosecution of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.