The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On July 11, 2017, the Plaintiff was diagnosed by the Defendant, who was a medical specialist in Songpa-gu Seoul (hereinafter “Defendant hospital”) on both sides of the out-to-date kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne, and was removed from the Defendant’s kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne k, and the Plaintiff was removed from the Defendant’s 10th kne kne kne k k k k k.

On February 28, 2018, the Plaintiff complained of the pain and pressure pain. On March 13, 2018, the Plaintiff sought to visit the Defendant Hospital on February 12, 2019, where the Plaintiff did not visit the Defendant Hospital. As a result of the X-ray test, the pelE test confirmed that the pelE of the pelE executives on the part of the pelE executives (hereinafter “the instant pelE”).

E. On June 10, 2019, the Plaintiff received medical treatment under the diagnosis of “the condition after the surgery of the outer scarcity of the scarcity of the scarcity of the scarcity of the scarcity of the scarcity of the scarcity of the scarcity of the scarcity of the scarcity of the scarcity of the scarcity of the scarcity of the scarcity of the scarcity of the scar

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1 to 7, Eul evidence 1 and 6, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiff's assertion is based on the following medical negligence and breach of duty to explain, and the plaintiff continues to do so.