logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원여주지원 2020.02.18 2015가단21730
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Based on the facts, Defendant B is a person who operates the E Hospital in Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant Hospital”), and Defendant C is the Plaintiff’s doctor.

On December 15, 2014, the Plaintiff complained of the pain of the right to the right, and applied the Defendant Hospital to the hospital.

As a result of the Defendant C’s self-official image (MRI) inspection conducted against the Plaintiff, Defendant C confirmed the Plaintiff’s opinion of “comprehion to the right side by the escape certificate No. 5 to No. 1 of the도요.”

On December 17, 2014, the Plaintiff was hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital, and was hospitalized from Defendant C, No. 5 to No. 1, who received the U.S.-S. Rab disc removal from Defendant C.

(hereinafter “the instant surgery”). On December 19, 2014, the Plaintiff complained of “the instant surgery” around 06:20, and the Defendant hospital observed the decline in the calendar that did not keep to the right as a result of the epic examination, and the epic inculation on the right side.

(hereinafter “the instant disease”). On December 20, 2014, the Plaintiff was subject to the neutical and neutism test by visiting the F Hospital on December 26, 2014, and on the 26th day of the same month. As a result of the neutism test, the Plaintiff’s view of “the neutical and neutical disease No. 5” was observed as a result of the neutism test.

On December 27, 2014, the Plaintiff was discharged from the Defendant Hospital.

On January 2, 2015, the Plaintiff was subject to the neutism and the neutism test. As a result of the neutism test, the Plaintiff’s opinion on the neutism No. 5 to 1 of the neutical neutism, and the opinion on the neutical neutism was observed as a result of the neutism test.

On September 2, 2015, the Plaintiff was subject to a nearby examination at H hospital, and as a result, the Plaintiff’s view of “non-psychotropic disease and pathical disease No. 4-5” was observed.

The plaintiff is currently in a state where there is an obstacle to the right side of the plaintiff, and there is a confluence and confluence of the right side of the bridge.

The relevant medical knowledge-based sewage can be found to have a stimulation and stimulation beyond the ne's function.

arrow