beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 30,318,893 as well as its annual 5% from January 15, 2016 to February 18, 2020 to the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. 1) The Plaintiff was in excess of stairs and was performed an operation under the diagnosis of Madern Hadern Madern Madern Madern Madern Madern Madern Madern Madern Madern Madern Madern
2) The Defendant operated the instant hospital on two occasions, and the doctor E and F took charge of the instant surgery on two occasions against the Plaintiff.
B. 1) On March 18, 2014, the Plaintiff was examined on his hand from the stairs, and was diagnosed on the right-side pelvis by applying his hand to the Department G located in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, and was diagnosed on May 21, 2014, and the Plaintiff received a fixed surgery on May 11, 2014 (hereinafter “the first operation”). On the 14th day of the same month, the Plaintiff was diagnosed on the upper part of the surgery, and was diagnosed on the metal plate around the metal plate, and was cut off from the doctor E of the instant hospital, and was diagnosed on the metal plate and the balles removal, new metal plate and balles removal, and the balles transplant surgery performed by a person (hereinafter “the first operation”).
3) On May 30, 2014, the day after the instant first surgery, the Plaintiff was diagnosed with the right pelma, and on September 17, 2014, and October 14, 2014, there was no recovery dog, and there was an electrical and biological opinion suggesting that the right pelma is cutting complete complete with almost complete pelma, in the electrical diagnosis, and on January 20, 2015 and May 15, 2015, the Plaintiff was still under observation of the evidence of the distribution before and after comparison, but was diagnosed as still incomplete recovery. (iv) On November 5, 2015, the Plaintiff was unable to recover symptoms because the symptoms were caused to the instant hospital, but the Plaintiff did not remove the complete appeal, and received an operation from the Plaintiff on January 21, 2015 and the instant hospital’s “the instant medical doctor” (hereinafter “the instant medical doctor”).
C. The plaintiff 1 was treated after the completion of treatment.