logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.02.22 2017고단8455
공기호부정사용등
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months and by a fine of 1,00,000 won.

The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who has entrusted a motor vehicle by an automobile consigned company operated by Defendant E in the Songdo export complex located in Yeonsu-gu Incheon Metropolitan City Sports Complex.

1. On May 31, 2017, the Defendants conspired to commit the joint crime, and around 15:30 on the B-do export 2 complex in Yeonsu-gu Incheon, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon. Defendant B stored the F-motor vehicle registration number plate, which was cancelled, which was secured by an influor method, in his/her own A-to-pured car. Defendant A kept the F-motor vehicle registration plate in his/her own A-to-pur vehicle. Defendant A was in custody of Defendant B on the 1 ton of cargo

F Motor Vehicle Registration Number Board was arbitrarily attached on May 31, 2017, and around 15:50 on May 31, 2017, the F Motor Vehicle was operated at a place, such as H oil station, front road in Yeonsu-gu Incheon Metropolitan City G.

As a result, the Defendants used an automobile registration number plate which is air straw for the purpose of exercising, and exercised an automobile registration number plate which is air strawing in an unlawful way.

2. Defendant A

A. The Defendant in violation of the Road Traffic Act is a person engaging in driving service of one ton of cargo vehicles, revoked registration.

On May 31, 2017, at around 15:50, the Defendant proceeded two lanes in front of H gas station in Yeonsu-gu Incheon Metropolitan City G, with a speed of about 10km from three parallels:3 parallels to one another.

At the same time, there were vehicles temporarily stopping in the signal atmosphere, so in such a case, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to take care of the operation of the vehicle well, and to prevent the accident by accurately manipulating the steering direction and brakes.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and was negligent in proceeding on the front side of the same lane, and the victim I (hereinafter, 51 years old) who was temporarily stopped at the same lane as he was driven by JMW car, and received the part concerning the panion as the front part of the said cargo vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant’s negligence in performing the above business is equivalent to approximately KRW 1,812,447 of the repair cost for the said BMW car.

arrow