1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) is jointly and severally liable to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) for KRW 6,742,404 and its amount from December 14, 2016.

The main lawsuit and counterclaim are also examined.

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendants are friendly between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff, and the relationship between the relationship between the Plaintiff and the private relationship.

B. At around 19:30 on August 14, 2016, Defendant B reported the Plaintiff’s her mother’s desire in front of the Ecafeteria located in Gongju-si, and her mother’s desire to do so, and her fat up to the floor by making the Plaintiff’s fating the Plaintiff’s fat and face with both drinking, and Defendant C took four-time the Plaintiff’s fat and face, going beyond the Defendant B’s aforementioned behavior.

(hereinafter “instant tort No. 1” As a result, the Plaintiff suffered injury, such as the cutting of internal walls, which require treatment for about six weeks.

C. The Plaintiff, at the same time and place as above, dumped Defendant B’s fat, and fatd Defendant B’s fat, and fatd Defendant C’s body with fat, and fatd Defendant C’s fat at the restaurant, and fatd Defendant C’s right eye by drinking fat, and continued to conduct physical fighting with the Defendants and Defendant C, and met Defendant B’s face after the fatd.

(hereinafter referred to as “the second tort of this case”). Accordingly, Defendant B suffered from an inner coordinate, etc. in need of treatment for approximately two weeks, and Defendant C suffered from an inner spawn, spawn and spawn which require treatment for approximately two weeks.

[Grounds for Recognition: Evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3, Evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 10 (if any, with a serial number)

(i) each entry or video, and the purport of the entire pleadings

2. Judgment on the principal lawsuit

A. According to the above facts, the Defendants committed the first tort of this case, which inflicted an injury on the Plaintiff, at the same time.

Therefore, the Defendants jointly have a duty to compensate the Plaintiff for damages arising from the first tort of this case.

B. (i) The Plaintiff, as the number of trees, was 180,000 won per day. However, due to the primary tort of this case, the Plaintiff was able to earn profit.