logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2018.08.16 2018나103486
손해배상(기)
Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendants, around 01:30 on June 8, 2013, on the street in front of the Furasian in Jeju Island, and Plaintiff B, under the influence of alcohol, had a conflict with Defendant C with one another.

Defendant D, as a drinking, took part in the back of Plaintiff B’s back head, and Defendant C took part in the face of Plaintiff B, which was over the above time.

이어서 피고 C은 이를 말리려는 원고 B의 처인 원고 A를 손으로 밀치고 주먹으로 그녀의 얼굴 부위를 수회 때렸으며, 피고 D는 이에 가세하여 주먹으로 원고 A의 얼굴 부위를 1회 때려 넘어뜨리고 발로 그녀의 몸통을 수회 걷어찼다.

As a result, the Defendants jointly inflicted injury on Plaintiff B on the left-hand side of No. 44 weeks of medical treatment, which requires approximately four weeks of medical treatment, and inflicted injury on Plaintiff A, such as the extraction of the whole part of the left-hand side, which requires approximately nine weeks of medical treatment.

(hereinafter “instant injury”). B.

The Defendants were indicted for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint injury) in relation to the instant injury, and the judgment became final and conclusive after being sentenced to the community service order of October, 2013 and 160 hours from the Incheon District Court’s Branch Branch on November 28, 2013 (No. 2013 Highest2477).

(See Evidence Nos. 9-3). 【Reason Nos. 1, 2, 4, and 9 (if there are more than one number, including the number; hereinafter the same shall apply)’s respective entries and the purport of the whole pleadings in the grounds for recognition.

2. The plaintiffs suffered losses as stated in the following table due to the injury of this case, which is a joint tort by the defendants' joint tort.

The defendants shall jointly compensate the plaintiffs for each of the above damages. A.

Plaintiff

Plaintiff A’s claim modification is made in the following cases: (a) the Plaintiff sought compensation of KRW 21,762,706 as damages (see, e.g., preparatory documents of August 22, 2017) as stated in Table 1; and (b) the Plaintiff’s claim modification is made in this court, as stated in Table 2.

arrow