A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 10, 2017, the Defendant who damaged property: (a) at the parking lot in front of the emergency room of the C Hospital located in the C Hospital located in Stitu City B on October 10, 2017, the Defendant: (b) destroyed the Defendant to have the 1,043,90 won of the market value, such as the car car color damaged due to the Defendant’s string and the string window, the string window, the driver’s seat, etc. owned by the Victim D, which was parked in the front place and the telephone with the string; and (c) damaged the string to have the repair cost in excess of 1,043,90 won of the market value, such as the damage of the string.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties at the time specified in paragraph 1, who was arrested by the police officers affiliated with the F police box of the Gyeonggi Sports Police Station, on board the front seat of the G patrol police station and moved to the F police box, during which he was sent to the lower seat of the G patrol police station, and was sent to the latter police box. The Defendant “I am Do Do Do Do Do Do , Do Do , Do ,” and “N Do d

Before the patrol car, the police officer, who is a police officer belonging to the above police station, committed assault, such as her crym, her crym, and her h's h's h's h', and her h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h' and h's h's h' h' h's h

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the prevention, suppression, etc. of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with regard to I, H, and D;

1. Application of the written estimate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), Article 366 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for each crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Crimes 1 (Interference with the Execution of Official Duties) of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence, the basic area (from June to one year and six months) of the Act on the Punishment of Crimes (Interference with the Execution of Official Duties) (the scope of a recommended sentence) is irrelevant to the execution of official duties (the scope of interference with the performance of official duties and coercion of duties).