logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.02.04 2015고단6203
공무집행방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of seven million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 9, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 03:35, around Busan Northern-gu, Busan Northern-gu, and the victim D (73 taxes) brought about a powder cancellation fire extinguishing machine (3.3km) equipped with the second floor corridor inside the complex building in the E-state, managed by the Defendant and the victim D (73 taxes) in his/her hand, and did not turn out to his/her hand, with a large quantity of fire extinguishing machine powder charging materials at the floor inside the elevator and the entrance of the first floor.

Accordingly, the defendant has undermined the utility of the de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto 20,000 won in the market.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties at the time and time as described in the above paragraph (1) above, and at the place of 112, was arrested as a flagrant offender on the charge of property damage by GJ belonging to the Busan Police Station G, the Busan Police Station G, and the patrol officer H, and was on the back seat of the 112 patrol police officer and went to the FJ as he was on the back seat of the 112 patrol police officer, and interfered with the legitimate performance of official duties by the police officer due to the following: “At the end of the launch rings, the Defendant was able to take a bath at the end of the patrol rings, by putting the hand hand over with a wall blocking the back seat of the patrol rings.”

3. On September 9, 2015, the Defendant insultd the victims by openly referring the victim G, a police official who is investigating the fact of damage, etc. against D by the manager of the building indicated in the aforesaid paragraph 1 at F District located in Busan Northern District, Busan, on September 9, 2015, to “chilling the victims by talking them equal to the bitch flap, and the bitch bitch bitom of the death.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to D, G, and H;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Article 136 (1), Articles 311, and 366 of the Criminal Act regarding facts constituting an offense (to be punished by a fine in consideration of the fact that an agreement is made with the victim of the case of damage to property, the intimidation in the case of a crime interfering with the performance of official duties, the fact that the intimidation is relatively minor, the fact that the defendant is against the depth of the mistake, the age of the defendant

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that a provisional payment order shall be issued.

arrow