logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2017.08.17 2016고정2468
사기
Text

Defendant

A A Fines 1,00,000 won, Defendant B’s fine 1,500,000 won, and Defendant C’s fine 1,50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A As E (Traler: F), Defendant B is the Track Track G (Tracler: H) which is the Track Track Track, Defendant C is the driver belonging to K (Hacler: J) who is the Track Track Track Track and the driver belonging to K (Hacler) who is the Track Track Track Track.

Oil support system for commercial cargo vehicles is being implemented from June 2001 on the basis of the Trucking Transport Business Act.

Accordingly, if the owner of a truck has received an oil purchase card from the credit card company with the approval of the local government having jurisdiction over the place of registration of the cargo vehicle and then pays it by the card, the credit card company shall compensate for 345.54 won per 1 liter out of the transit oil price from the local government concerned and pay it by the card, and the freight owner who has paid the card shall provide the oil support in the way of claiming only the remaining amount.

Since Defendants received oil from the competent authority on all or part of the increase in oil tax due to the reorganization of energy tax in 2001, they should pay fuel through a powered vehicle with oil subsidies, and they should not receive fuel through a powered vehicle, such as a stringr and a string vehicle with no power-driven vehicle.

1. From July 12, 2013 to December 27, 2015, Defendant A and the Defendant: (a) paid part of the transit through oil tanks installed in freezing tanks to operate an engine connected to the motive of the freezing set up in the freezing r in order to operate the freezing r, the Defendant paid the entirety transit of the oil tanks by using an oil purchase card approved by the head of the Sincheon-gun Office, as if the fuel tank of the powered Etrac vehicle was mainly limited to the oil tank.

As a result, the Defendant had the victim Socheon-gun Office in 220, Seocheon-gun, Gyeonggi-do, Dongcheon-gun, Gyeonggi-do, 4.4.

arrow