Defendant

A Imprisonment for one year, Defendant B, and G shall be sentenced to four months of imprisonment, and Defendant C, D, E, and F shall be sentenced to six months of imprisonment.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A As a K gas station in the Gwangju Mine-gu, a person who actually manages the gas station above. Defendant B, Defendant C, Defendant D, Defendant E, Defendant F, Defendant G, M, N, P, P, Q, R, T, U, V, W, X, Y, Z (former summary type on the same day) is the next owner of an individual water vehicle.

The local government has set the limit of payment through every month on the basis of the maximum load of cargo vehicles with local tax revenue in order to alleviate the costs of oil for trucking business operators in accordance with the Subsidy Management Regulations, and has issued one oil purchase card per truck registered by the trucking business operator to assist the cost of oil and to facilitate and transparent procedures.

Defendant

B, as seen above, the borrower of the cargo, such as B, had the oil purchase card as above, paid the oil value by filling the volume of main oil over the amount of primary oil into the cargo station at the above K oil station, and then decided to purchase the freight to be paid to the personal vehicle, etc. of the above borrower as much as the difference between the actual amount of primary oil flow and the actual amount of the freight. Defendant A conspired with the above truck for the purpose of selling oil by attracting large-scale cargo vehicles, a superior customer, even though he was aware that the above cargo could not receive the oil payment if the borrower pays the amount different from the actual amount of the liquor, at the above K oil station.

1. On March 19, 2013, the Defendants jointly committed the crimes of Defendant A and Defendant B paid the said amount with the oil purchase card registered with the said vehicle, as if they were to pass through the 474,747 won on a 14 ton of a 14 ton of a 14 ton of an AA AA modern beginning truck operated by Defendant B, which was operated by Defendant B.

However, in fact, Defendant B only spent the truck at the above time, which is equivalent to KRW 171,593, and thus, the main flow is lower than the actual flow.