A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 21, 2013, the Defendant was found in the victim F’s residence in the apartment apartment E-gu, the Defendant would receive monthly pay from the victim, who borrowed 12 million won to the victim for use as insurance designer’s activities and living expenses.

“A false representation was made.”

However, the facts are as follows: even if the defendant receives a monthly salary, the defendant has bonds with the financial authority and the second financial authority, and because the monthly income, educational institute expenses, public charges, etc. are in arrears, it is urgent to pay interest and living expenses, so even if he receives a loan from the injured party, he/she did not have an intention or ability to change it.

Nevertheless, the Defendant was issued 12 million won from the seat by deceiving the victim as such.

In addition, from August 21, 2013 to May 6, 2014, the Defendant received 6,8830,000 won in total as the borrowed money on 25 occasions as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Form.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

2. Forging a private document;

A. According to the date and time of the crime committed on or around October 2013, the Defendant: (a) around September 2013; (b) according to the victim’s prosecutor’s statement and the victim’s prosecutor’s statement and the legal statement, the delivery of the above forged document is recognized as around October 2013; and (c) the Defendant also forged and disturbed the lease contract at the victim’s request to show his/her own ability to repay with the continued loan; (d) it is reasonable to deem the Defendant to forge and use the document after September 23, 2013, which is the date stated in the contract.

Accordingly, the date of crime is recognized as around October 2013.

In order to show F’s ability to repay the borrowed money from F to F, as stated in paragraph 1, the fact that the Defendant had resided in KRW 5 million and monthly rent of KRW 750,000 and KRW 7.5 million in his/her residence, he/she had the intention to forge a real estate lease agreement to run as if he/she had resided in KRW 70,000 and KRW 7.5 million in his/her residence.

The defendant around that time is G apartment of the original city.