logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2017.06.15 2017고단89
사문서위조등
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is the representative E of the limited company E in Jeonjin-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

A. On December 9, 2013, the Defendant: (a) entered into an oral contract for the extension of the victim F and the second floor of the new apartment tower of the G Building at the E office of the said limited company E company; and (b) did not have prepared the standard contract for the additional construction works; (c) the Defendant entered into a computer screen and the said standard contract for the additional construction works with the victim as evidence for civil action against the victim; (d) copied the column of the contractor of the standard contract for the construction of the G Building with the victim as of August 9, 2012; and (e) copied it to the owner and the contractor column of the building; and (e) attached it to the owner and the contractor column of the standard contract for the additional construction works written at the computer network as of the above.

As a result, the Defendant forged on January 10, 201, which was the name of the victim of a private document on rights and obligations for the purpose of uttering.

B. On December 31, 2013, the Defendant: (a) filed with the Jeonju District Court an additional construction standard agreement; (b) the Jeonju District Court 2013 filed against the victim; and (c) filed an attachment to the written complaint for construction cost 9078.

2. Determination

A. The term “a document forgery” refers to the preparation of a document by a person without authority to prepare a document using the name of another person. Thus, if there was an explicit or implied consent of the nominal owner in the preparation of a private document (see Supreme Court Decision 97Do183, Feb. 24, 1998). In such a case, the use of a forged document premised on a forged document cannot be established.

B. The Defendant, as the husband of F, is an additional construction contract for the issuance of a letter of warranty for the performance of defective repair and the report on the performance of construction work, etc. to H that led on behalf of F in lieu of F.

arrow