logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2016.09.23 2016고단963
사문서위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 2013, the Defendant entered into a contract with D to take over the E-F’s “F” auto industrial company located in the same person’s possession of the same person, and in order to register the business entity of the said car industry company in the name of the Defendant, the Defendant was to prepare a lease contract without stating deposit and monthly rent on the said real estate, and the lease deposit and monthly rent were to be held upon receipt of the lease contract under the name of D, the title of this official space.

On June 12, 2014, the Defendant changed the lease agreement in the name of D by stating “day (100,000,000)” in the column for the lease deposit and monthly rent for the rent of the lease contract (guarantee deposit) held as above, and “1,00,000,000” in the monthly rent column. On June 12, 2014, the Defendant submitted it to the public official in charge of the fact that it has been altered at the office of the tax administration and the office of the Pakistan-si on June 12, 2014.

In addition, on April 6, 2015, the Defendant submitted a modified lease agreement to the Cheongyang Branch of the District Court, to a staff member of the said Court who is unaware of the fact that it has been altered, upon filing an application for distribution in a voluntary auction case conducted through G of the said Court.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the defendant altered the private document on the rights and obligations of the name D, and exercised it twice.

2. On September 15, 2015, the Defendant who forged a private document and carried out the said investigation document: (a) at the I.A. Industrial Complex Office located in H on September 15, 2015; and (b) at the time of strike, the fact that the Defendant had not concluded a contract with D for construction of “F” buildings located in E; (c) as a result of voluntary auction on the said F. building and land, the Defendant would use the said document as a lien report; and (d) under A4, the Defendant would prepare a contract for construction work under the direct control that the Defendant would have to construct a new building with the amount of KRW 613,36,00 on the E’s land at the time of the strike; and (d) thereafter, D.

arrow