logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.06.10 2016고단325
절도등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 6, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. by the Daegu District Court on February 6, 2014, and on May 29, 2015, the Defendant completed the execution of the sentence in the first intersection of the North Korean Branch.

"2016 Highest 325"

1. On December 31, 2015, around 18:15, the Defendant, at the “F clothes shop” managed by the victim E in the D department stores located in Jung-gu Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul. Around December 31, 2015, the Defendant attempted to commit a crime by preventing the victim, who had been present at a different place the gap in the victim’s neglect of locked due diligence, from holding one wooden 1 point of the market price equivalent to KRW 4,345,000 and one cot of KRW 2,779,000 in the market price.

2. On December 31, 2015, at the “H” clothes store managed by the victim G in the above department store, the Defendant: (a) obstructed the victim’s attempt by unsatising one string of 4,430,000 won and one string of 2,630,000 won at the market price where the victim was displayed at a different place; (b) obstructed the victim’s unsatising one string of 4,430,000 won and one string of 2,630,000 won.

3. On January 8, 2016, at the same place as “2.” around 19:40 on January 8, 2016, at the same time as “2.”, the Defendant: (a) carried out a cre in a cresh that the said victim G neglected due care; (b) placed one color tag at a price equivalent to KRW 3,170,000 at which the said victim G was displayed at a different place; (c) and (d) cut off the cresh with one sheet at a price equivalent to KRW 2,170,00

On December 31, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 22:05 on December 31, 2015, 2015, the Defendant: (b) had the victim K in Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu, with his/her own bank in his/her mouth, opened the said bridge by using the crepan of coffees; and (c) did not have the intent to restrain the employees of the said store, who observed it.

Summary of Evidence

[2016 order 325]

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness G, L and E;

1. Each police statement protocol against G, L, or E;

1. The investigation report (related to photographing and pricing of damaged objects);

arrow