logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2019.05.16 2019고합31
살인미수등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for four years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant of "2019 Highly 31" thought that the victim had been accommodated in the other male and her mother, due to internal relations with the victim B (n, 57 years of age), the victim had been able to file a complaint with the victim.

On January 31, 2019, around 00:24 around 00:24, outline of the operation of victims in Daegu-gun C

In the main place, even though the female entertainment loan was not made, the victim was able to kill the victim by continuously obtaining the face from the victim on several hand, while making a conflict with the victim by reporting that the victim returned the female entertainment loan as it is.

Accordingly, the Defendant intending to murder the victim by putting the knife (30 cm in total length, 17 cm in a knife) on the left hand and moving the part of the victim's right side to a knife, moving the knife to a knife, and then driving the part of the victim's left side to a knife once. However, the Defendant attempted to kill the victim by driving the knife on the part of the victim's left side, but did not commit a attempted murder by driving the knife of the knife wall that requires approximately two weeks medical treatment.

"2019 Highly 69"

1. On January 1, 2019, the Defendant of the obstruction of performance of official duties: (a) stated that “I am in front of the vehicle, if I am in front of the vehicle, I am in front of the vehicle, I am in front of the vehicle, I am in front of the vehicle, and I am in front of the vehicle, I am in front of the vehicle, who was called “I am in front of, I am in front of the police, I am in front of the vehicle, I am in front of the vehicle, I am in front of the vehicle, I am in front of the vehicle, I am in front of the vehicle, and I am in front of the vehicle, I am in front of the vehicle, I am in front of the am in front of, “I am in front of, I am in front of, I am in front of,” “I am in this am in front of, I am in front of this am in front of it twice.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

2...

arrow