logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2019.05.28 2018고단1290
상해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 16, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 03:20, at the same time as “C” located on the second floor of the Yansan-gu building B in the front city; (b) on the part of the victim D (25 years of age), without any justifiable reason, said that the victim D (a person aged 25) followed by smoking in a smoking room, and (c) carried the victim’s head one time and one time with the victim’s hand, by breaking the breath and heading the victim’s left head.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim.

2. At around 03:50 on the same day, the injured Defendant, on the ground that the victim E (the age of 24) was told at the time of assaulting D as above, she, called “Nea” and, by hand, sealed the victim’s breath’s breath and head, and sustained the victim’s breath with his breath’s breath in five times and one-two weeks of her head by drinking, and sustained the victim’s breath in one time of the victim’s head by having the victim’s breath in five times and one week of her head.

Accordingly, the defendant injured the victim.

3. From 04:05 on the same day, the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender by the police officer of the Jeonju Police Station G police station at the front floor of the F building in the front floor of the front of the building in the front of the front city of the front city of 04:05 on the same day. In the process of arresting the Defendant as a flagrant offender, the Defendant: (a) the police officer of the Jeonju Police Station to take advantage of the Defendant’s arms in order to take aboard the patrol vehicle; and (b) the face of the H police officer at the bottom of the elbow in the front floor of the building in the front city of 2 times.

이에 H 순경이 피고인의 팔을 뒤로 하여 수갑을 채우고 다시 순찰차에 탑승시키려 하자, 피고인은 무릎으로 H 순경의 얼굴을 1회 가격하고 발로 H 순경의 팔 부위를 수회 찼다.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reported cases and the arrest of a flagrant offender, which is a police official.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. Each statement (D, E, and H);

1. A report on internal investigation;

arrow