logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2016.05.25 2015고단5100
사기등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, and for six months, each of the defendants B.

The request of the applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants drafted a false lease agreement between Bromoer, including one-person E, and Defendant F’s father G, with the lessor, using it, received a loan from the victim Mimeri Co., Ltd., and conspired in order to divide it.

1. According to the above public offering, the Defendants of the forgery of private document indicated as follows; Defendant B: (a) on January 2013, 2013, to Bromoers, including E, the father’s resident registration certificate, etc.; and (b) B, etc., using the above resident registration certificate in the location column in the apartment lease contract form; and (c) on the deposit column, “10,000,000 won” in the deposit column; and (d) on the lessor’s address column, “Seoul Gangnam-gu I Apartment-gu 7,803,00,000,000,000,000 won; and (e) on the resident registration number column, the name in the name in the name in the column of the lessor’s name in which the false lessor was stated as “G” and possessed in advance thereafter.

G’s seal is affixed, and Defendant A entered “A” in the lessee’s name column in the above authorized broker and affixed Defendant A’s seal.

As a result, the Defendants conspired with brobeers, etc., forged a chapter on the lease contract in the name of G, which is a private document on rights and obligations for the purpose of uttering.

2. On April 1, 2013, Defendant A applied for a loan of KRW 180,000,000 to the employee in charge of the loan and submitted a false lease contract, etc. as provided in paragraph (1), and applied for a loan of KRW 180,000,000 to the employee in charge of the loan as if it were actually used as a deposit for the lease.

However, in fact, the above lease contract was made by falsity, and the defendants did not intend to use the loan as the deposit money.

The defendant B is also the defendant B.

arrow