logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2016.03.02 2015고단2958
사기
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for a year and six months, for a defendant B to 8 months, and for a defendant C to 2 years and six months, respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport of 2958, "The Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport", "The Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport of 2015 high-class 2958, has operated a system of loans for pre-paid housing with interest rate lower than the market interest rate if an application for a loan is filed with only certain documents such as a certificate of employment, a detailed statement of salary, etc. without any special security,

1. On June 2013, Defendants A and B committed joint crimes, together with C and name influencies (one name G), Defendant A play a false lessor; Defendant B takes a false lessee’s role; Defendant B submitted documents related to his/her false employment and a false lease agreement with the financial institution and conspired in order to receive and divide the total amount of housing rent from the financial institution.

On June 28, 2013, upon the public offering as above, C and name Buddhist G entered the Defendant B with a false employment certificate, income tax collection confirmation, and salary specifications, etc. The above Defendants, at the JA’s office located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, drafted a false multi-family house lease agreement that the Defendant B leases the “Seoul 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won.

Defendant

B around June 28, 2013, around 1778, the victim new bank-based branch office in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, applied for a loan of the entire house loan to the employee in charge of loan who is unable to know his name in the office of the new bank-based branch office in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and submitted a false employment certificate and a written lease contract, and used the loan as the deposit for the entire house.

A false statement was made.

However, in fact, Defendant B did not rent the above house from Defendant A, and there was no intention to use the loan as a deposit for a deposit for a deposit for a deposit for a deposit for a deposit, and the Defendants are named C and name omitted (one name).

arrow