logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2012.08.16 2012고정428
농업협동조합법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a member of the Ulsan-gun C Association in Ulsan-gun.

No person shall be provided with money, goods, entertainment or other property benefits for the purpose of having a specific person elected or not elected as an executive of a local agricultural cooperative.

On February 2, 2011, the Defendant, at the Defendant’s house located in Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, and at the Defendant’s house located in Ulsan-gun, as of July 27, 201, received the Defendant’s 50,000 won of cash 4, totaling KRW 20,000,000, when the Defendant complained of support for the election of the president of the cooperative, to the effect that “I will go out to the election of the president of the cooperative,” “I want to go out of the election of the president of the cooperative.”

As a result, the Defendant received KRW 200,000 for the purpose of getting E to be elected at the CUnion head.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of witness E;

1. Protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E by the prosecution;

1. The Defendant denies the facts charged to the effect that the Defendant did not have any contact with E from the investigative agency to this court, and that there was no money from E as stated in the facts charged.

However, according to macroscopic evidence, E can be acknowledged that the defendant facops a coffee with the defendant at a place where the defendant facops the collection of the defendant's office at the time specified in the facts charged, and the defendant first leaves the above place and sets up 20,000 won on the table of the table, and E asks the defendant to cooperate in the election of the president of the partnership, such as the

agency shall encourage this action.

Although the words mentioned above are stated to the effect that there was no error in the election of the president of the association, there was no speech related to the election of the president of the association, and there was no attempt to directly give money, it is difficult to easily understand that the defendant gains money on the job of the defendant without any mentioning the name of the defendant.

Defendant

And E also work at the time.

arrow