logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2014.05.19 2014고합105
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(절도)
Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four years;

2. One gold blings confiscated, five bble gift certificates, and lot department stores;

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 17, 2007, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, etc., in the Gunsan Branch of the Jeonju District Court, for two years and six months. On November 19, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for the same crime from the Seoul High Court on November 19, 2009, and was finally sentenced to four years for the same crime, and on June 17, 2013, the execution of the sentence has

2. The Defendant habitually committed the crime, around 18:30 on February 19, 2014, using the F apartment 101 Dong 1701 and 1701 on February 19, 2014 and the victim E’s house enter the house by destroying and damaging the lock lock locking device, and entering the house by adding up the locking locking device. Two (400,000 won in cash), E’s ownership, one half of the market price of KRW 500,000 in half of the amount of KRW 3 million in the market price, three (750,000 won in the market price, three (3) the net swine of KRW 3.50,00 in the market price, one (200,000 in the city price, and (3)0,000,000 won in the city, and (3)0,000,000 won in the house or one (3) 19,014.

Summary of Evidence

1. Crimes indicated in judgment;

(a) Defendant's legal statement;

B. Statement of the police against D

(c) Each E and G statement;

(d) Police seizure records;

E. Investigation report by the prosecution (verification of sunset time related to the crime on February 19, 2014)

(f) Each photograph;

2. Criminal records shown in the judgment;

(a) An inquiry report;

(b) Prosecution investigation report (suspect A and criminal records of the same kind);

3. Although the habitual criminal defendant in the holding has five times the history of the same or larceny crime, in view of the fact that the criminal defendant committed the crime of this case repeatedly and repeatedly over three times within the repeated crime period after the execution of the sentence was completed, and that the method of the crime is identical or similar, the criminal defendant is recognized as a habit of larceny.

arrow