The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is as follows: (a) the Defendant: (b) was a person using the clinic B (A: C); and (c) on August 18, 2015, the Defendant entered the news bulletin board of the next news bulletin board into D in the column for writing comments comments on the article “An excessive radius, but, in so doing, an excessive radius of the E depth,” which was written on August 18, 2015; and (b) was indicted for a good case that was inside before e-mail; and (c) e-mail was drinking only.

In the case of a single refusal, but governance punishment is several.

At the time of being in the school, the comments on the comments of "the four novels" were written and posted to the victim E by openly insulting it.

2. As a crime falling under Article 311 of the Criminal Act, a public prosecution may be instituted only when a complaint is filed under Article 312(1) of the Criminal Act.

According to the head of the withdrawal of complaint filed in the record, the victim can recognize the fact that he/she revoked the complaint against the defendant on January 20, 2016, which was after the prosecution of this case.

Therefore, the public prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act.