The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The Defendant did not recognize his mistake on September 24, 2017 by accessing C’s Internet site at the office located in the office located in Ansan-si, Mansan-si, Annsan-si, and refer to C’s general secretary on the free bulletin board.

(b) The expression of garbage is an hiverous expression.

A person who habitually forcibly forces female employees who do not have been able to use his high-class position to engage in an indecent act is not a garbage but a person who has habitually posted an comments on the comments " which is not a garbage," and publicly insulting the victim by posting the comments on nine occasions between around October 7, 2017, as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Form.

2. Determination of the above facts charged is a crime falling under Article 311 of the Criminal Act and can be prosecuted only upon a victim’s complaint pursuant to Article 312(1) of the Criminal Act. According to the records, the victim’s withdrawal of the complaint on October 22, 2018, which is the date of prosecution. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327(5) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.