Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On September 28, 2012, the Defendant: (a) at the public service center of the Changwon Police Station in Changwon-si, a new window of Changwon-si, around September 23, 2012, the Defendant: (b) around September 22, 2012: (c) around the Central East-distance, which is located in the central Dong of Changwon-si, Changwon-si; (d) around September 22, 2012, there was no fact that C used the Defendant’s chest at approximately four weeks of medical treatment for the next four weeks; (b) however, for the purpose of having the Defendant subject to criminal punishment, C submitted the Defendant’s chest to the public service station to the effect that “A, the Defendant, was tightly sealed the Defendant’s Defendant, who was seated while drinking at the first half of September 23, 2012, was taking the chest of the Defendant’s chest, who was in a state of launding, and was frighted by having the Defendant undergo a diagnosis of the Defendant’s.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. A copy of judgment;

1. Copies of each protocol of examination of witness with respect to D, E, and F;

1. An investigation report (Attachment to the investigation records of the case in which a suspect filed a complaint against the complainant) [Attachment to the investigation records of the case in which the accused and the defense counsel asserted that the facts of the complaint are true, but the accused C has consistently stated from the investigation agency that the facts of the complaint are false, the Changwon District Court 2013Ma691 (the first instance court), 2013No2557 (the facts of the complaint have been falsely stated from the investigation agency to the criminal case against himself/herself), and E, F, and D had a verbal dispute between C and the accused at the time, but they had no physical fighting at the time, and the accused's wife G also stated to the effect that "C has sound from the street at the time, and it was impossible for C to s/ E, F, D, and G to s/he/she had the credibility of each of the above statements, so long as each of the above statements is consistent and consistent."