A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On June 18, 2014, the defendant, at the office of the non-permanent certified judicial scrivener in Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-do, ordered an employee of the non-indicted C to make oral statements about false complaints.

The content of the “Defendant C, a party to the lawsuit, laid the complainant on June 7, 2014 to the car driven by the Defendant at the Yannam-si (hereinafter referred to as the “Yannam-si”), and detained him on the top of the car operation in tape, and caused an injury which requires approximately two weeks of treatment by drinking the complainant who raised the complaint.” There was no fact that C was detained or committed when he was detained by the Defendant.

Nevertheless, on the 19th day of the same month, the defendant submitted the above complaint to the police officer who is unable to know his name at the public service center of the Boan Police Station in 33, Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-do, and on the same day, was investigated by the assistant D belonging to the police station and stated to the same effect as the complaint complaint

As a result, the defendant was arrested for the purpose of having C receive criminal punishment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness C and E;

1. Examination protocol of suspect C by the prosecution;

1. The police statement of the defendant;

1. A complaint;

1. The investigation report (F's G president's statement) and the defense counsel asserted that the fact of the accusation is true, but the defendant and the defense counsel consistently state that the fact of the accusation is false from the investigation agency to the present court. The defendant's intending to avoid the accusation is also consistent with this law, and the defendant's child on the vehicle stated in the complaint also stated in this court that the complainant's mother forced the investigation agency to make a statement that the fact of accusation is true. Thus, as long as the above C and E's statements are consistent and consistent, it is difficult to find any other circumstance to reject its credibility.

Therefore, C and E's statements are made.