The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. On September 22, 2012, the Defendant heard a novel that the president of the central Dong-dong, Changwon-si, in the vicinity of 05:00 on September 22, 2012, the Defendant: (a) had the president of the party headquarters return to him/her at around 05:0 of the same day; and (b) had the president of the party headquarters enter the E (F) in which he/she himself/herself, D, and surrounding areas, as a G restaurant; and (c) at that place, D said D said that “I have a relationship with the president of the party headquarters,” and said D said D said “I have been seated on the mixed road of the party headquarters,” and said D said D said D said D said “I had Na Na (5:0 p.m., a new wall) to walk the 2-3 p.m.’s chest,” and said D said D said D’s chest to take care of the 2-3 p.m.

2. The judgment was based on D’s police investigation as evidence corresponding to the facts charged of this case and the statements in this court. However, the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, namely, ① at the present site (D also stated that E(F was at the present site) was in the police investigation and this court’s statement to the effect that “D was drinking on the new wall at the night after that day, and there was no physical dispute between the Defendant and the Defendant at that time, but at that time, there was no body or fighting.” The F stated to the effect that “D was at the present time at that time at that time at that time at that time at that time at that time at that time at that time at that time at that time at that time at that time at that time at that time at that time at the conversation with the Defendant was stated to the same effect as “I cannot know about the Defendant that D’s d’s satry, satisfy, and satisfying it at that time after the incident at that time after that time at that time at that time at that time at that time.”