logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2020.09.10 2019고단4358
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2019 Highest 4358"

1. Interference with business;

A. On July 20, 2019, the Defendant committed the crime of July 20, 2019, around 22:30 on July 20, 2019, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s apartment security service by force by avoiding a large of about one hour and 30 minutes of the amount of damage caused by the death, by entering into the Ddong security room where the victim C (70 years of age) (the security guard) works in the Nam-gu Seoul metropolitan apartment complex, and by taking advantage of the Ddong security room where the victim C (70 years of age) is working.

B. On July 21, 2019, the Defendant committed the crime of July 21, 2019, around 07:00, obstructed the victim’s apartment security service by force by entering the Fdong guard room where the victim E (the 68-year-old age), who is security guards, takes a bath at the Fdong Guard room where the victim E (the 68-year-old age), is working, and under the influence of alcohol, taking a large amount of 30 minutes of rain, such as cexpe and boom.

2. On October 4, 2019, the injured Defendant: (a) around 22:40, on the ground that the injured party C (the 70-year-old security guard) who was the said B apartment G G G security guard was off and off his/her pursuant to the pursuant pursuant to the body of the injured party’s entrance, the injured Defendant was suffering from the injury of the injured party and the injury of the satise of the mouth and the satise of the mouth for treatment for about two weeks

"200 Highest 3127"

3. Around 09:00 on May 13, 2020, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol in front of the H apartment I door of the Defendant, and was aware of and locked in the front of the Jho Lake, which is the house of the Defendant, and the resident in the above residence opened a door and opened up the door to enter the house, but it was difficult to avoid disturbance by opening the door to close up the door and opening the door, and making the door to “satisfashing and selling the door.”

As above, the Defendant: (a) took care of the Defendant, who was an employee of the apartment management office at the site after receiving a report that the Defendant was suffering from disturbance; (b) took care of the Defendant; and (c) assaulted the Defendant by means of drinking alcohol as he would be fluencing the victim.

Summary of Evidence

[2019 Highest 4358]

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1.C and E respective statements 1.

arrow