A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 27, 2017, the Defendant: (a) driven a F Poter under the influence of alcohol with a 0.09% alcohol concentration of blood 0.09% from the Do in front of C in the Dong-gu, Jinnam-si, Changwon-si; (b) around approximately 200 meters from the Do in front of the road to the E-road.

2. On April 27, 2018, the Defendant forged another’s signature with the intention of signing and using the signature in the signature column in the above signature column, and exercised it by presenting it to H, as if the above forged signature was duly formed, to the extent that: (a) the Defendant, at around 22:30 on April 27, 2018, was under the influence of drinking, as described in paragraph 1, on the front side of E, and was under the influence of drinking, from the police box at the police box at the police box at the police box at the police box at the police box at the police box at the police box at the police box at the police box at the police box at the police box at the police box at the police box at the time when the signature was requested to be signed in the driver’s signature column in the state’s circumstantial statement report.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Report on the circumstances of a driver of a driving school, notification of the results of regulating drinking driving, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report investigation;

1. Article 239(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense, Article 239(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 239(2) and Article 239(1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 148-2(2)3 of the Road Traffic Act (the point of drinking driving) concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The case is not easy in light of the reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, etc.

However, the defendant seems to have an attitude to reflect his mistake by recognizing his mistake.

The defendant voluntarily led to the confession of the contents of the crime by finding the investigative agency.

There is no past record of punishment exceeding a fine.

In addition, the punishment shall be determined as ordered in consideration of all the sentencing conditions shown in pleadings, such as the age, sex, environment, and circumstances after the crime.