logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2016.06.14 2016고단134
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] The defendant was sentenced to a fine of five million won for a crime of violating road traffic laws at the Changwon District Court on May 1, 2009, and a fine of five million won for a crime of violating road traffic laws at the Changwon District Court on December 24, 2014.

[Criminal facts]

1. On January 16, 2016, the Defendant: (a) violated the Road Traffic Act (divated driving) and the Road Traffic Act (divated driving) (divated driving) driving a C Poter truck under the influence of alcohol leveling of about 0.056% without obtaining a driver’s license from the section of approximately 2 km from the road in front of the Chang-si, Chang-si, Chang-si, Chang-si; (b) to the road in front of the Suwon Cooperative Co., Ltd., which is one-way fishery.

2. The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of CPoter cargo vehicles.

The Defendant violated signal provisions in front of the E oil station in Changwon-si E, Changwon-si, E, and was under traffic control by a police officer in front of the oil station in Changwon-si, but the Defendant neglected and proceeded as it was, and became under the direction of 112 patrols.

On January 16, 2016, at around 09:40, the Defendant driven the above cargo while driving the G road in F in the Sinsan-si, Masan-si, Masan-si, and proceeded the front of the G road to the trial of the Susan fire station.

The place is that the vehicle was parked on both sides of the road, which was difficult for the vehicle to operate simultaneously in the opposite direction, and the vehicle was driven in the opposite direction, and there was a cuss car in the victim H driving I, which was reported and suspended by the defendant, so the vehicle driver has a duty of care to prevent the accident in advance by driving safely at sufficient intervals with the victim's vehicle.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to do so and the police officer, who took the 112 patrol car at the 112 patrol car, was at the time when the freight of the defendant in front of the victim's passenger car, will be at the seat of the defendant as the driver's seat.

arrow