logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2018.09.05 2018고단545
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10 million.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 2, 2007, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1.5 million with a fine of KRW 1.5 million with a fine of KRW 1.5 million with a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Changwon District Court on February 11, 2008, a summary order of KRW 1.5 million with a fine of KRW 1.5 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Changwon District Court on February 11, 2008, and a summary order of KRW 7 million with a fine of KRW 1.5 million with a penalty of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Changwon District Court Branch on May 1, 2015, respectively.

On February 24, 2018, at around 22:45, the Defendant driven a Cobserver car under the influence of alcohol concentration of approximately 0.171% from the 300-meter section to the 300-distance road, where the Defendant is under the influence of alcohol during the blood alcohol concentration of about 0.171% on the two roads near the 19-dong, Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Masan-si, 19.

Accordingly, the Defendant, who violated the prohibition on drinking at least twice, was driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol in violation of the above provision.

2. On February 24, 2018, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) led the Defendant to the middle school of marine transportation, while driving the said vehicle under the influence of alcohol and driving it on a one-day basis, which is located in the 22-lane south-dong, Changwon-si, Masan-si, Masan-si, and driving it on a three-lane road from the side to the middle school of marine transportation, along the one-lane distance.

At the time, the Defendant had a duty of care to drive safely by examining the situation of the vehicle, since the Defendant followed the EM car driven by the victim D (W, 49 years old) prior to the same direction, the Defendant had a duty of care to drive safely.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant neglected to do so and led the victim to the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle by negligence.

Ultimately, the defendant needs to give approximately three weeks of medical treatment to the victim due to the above occupational negligence.

arrow