beta
Text
1. The plaintiff A farming association, the defendant N 46,152 won, and the defendant I together with the defendant N 23,076 won out of the above 46,152 won.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On December 31, 2012, Plaintiff A, the representative director of which was Plaintiff B, (hereinafter “Plaintiff A”) obtained a building permit for the land mooring facilities (hereinafter “instant facilities”) on the ground outside X-gun W (hereinafter “W”). On March 23, 2013, the instant construction work was completed on January 28, 2014 by contracting the said construction work (hereinafter “instant construction work”).
B. The Defendants are residents of W, and to enter the construction site of this case, they must pass through the farming paths of the ZA, AB, and AC village in which the Defendants reside (hereinafter “the village of this case”).
[In the absence of any dispute, Gap's 6, 15, and 29's 10,38's statements (including a serial number; hereinafter the same shall apply)
(2) The grounds of appeal No. 1
2. Determination as to the claim against the Defendants by the Plaintiff Corporation
A. 1) The Defendants asserted that the Plaintiff corporation is liable for damages (A) and the Defendants jointly committed a tort that obstructs the instant construction as indicated in the table, from June 4, 2013 to September 1, 2013, and thus, the Defendants jointly and severally are liable for damages incurred by the Plaintiff corporation.
On July 13, 106, 113. 13. 13. 13. 13. 07. 13. 07. 13. 08. 13. 08. 13. 008. 13. 06. 0. 13. 13. 0.... the Defendants installed a light railer on the road leading to the construction site of this case. The Defendants act as harmful to the drivers of the instant construction vehicles, and the instant construction vehicle does not enter the construction site of this case. On June 15, 313, 313, 196, the instant construction vehicle installed a light railer or a vehicle on the road leading to the construction site of this case to prevent the Defendants from entering the construction site of this case. As such, the instant construction vehicle does not enter the construction site of this case.