beta
Text
Defendants are not guilty. The summary of this judgment is publicly announced.
Reasons
1. Facts charged;
1. On December 7, 2012, around 16:20, the Defendants’ joint crime, at the D construction site located in Seopopoposi C, and under the management of the victim E company of the construction, the subcontractors were engaged in the work of manufacturing trilue block with the establishment and use of the project, and the construction vehicles, such as F, intended to enter the construction site for concrete building theory necessary for the work.
At this time, the Defendants, from G, etc. to 17:40 on the same day, interfered with the construction vehicles from leaving the closed timber and chairs at the entrance of the DD project team for one hour to 20 minutes from the same day, and holding them on the chair, thereby preventing them from leaving the construction site.
As a result, the Defendants, in collaboration with G, made it difficult to operate construction vehicles, such as one hour and 20-minutes vehicles by force, thereby hindering the construction work of private victims E Co., Ltd and partner companies.
2. On September 21, 2012, around 15:54, Defendant A, at the D construction site located in Seopopo City, Defendant E, the victim E, the partner company under the management of H Co., Ltd., the victim I, and J Co., Ltd. were engaged in production, such as Bluth, etc., and for the concrete building theory necessary for the work, the construction vehicle, such as L ready-mixed, belonging to K, intended to enter the construction site.
At this time, the Defendant, along with M, G, N, etc. from the same time until 16:21 on the same day, obstructed vehicles from leaving the construction site by hanging atat at the entrance of the DD project team, making it difficult for them to cover or enjoy the 27 minutes.
As a result, the Defendant, in collaboration with M&A, made it difficult to operate construction vehicles, such as 27-minuted vehicles, by force, thereby obstructing the construction work of the victim E corporation, H corporation, cooperation corporation, and J corporation.
From the same time until October 15, 2012, the Defendant, as indicated in the list of crimes in the attached Table, has prevented the victims from performing their work by force on a total of seven occasions.
2. Determination: