logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2018.12.07 2013고단990
업무방해
Text

The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

Reasons

1. Facts charged;

1. On April 12, 2013, at the construction site located in Seopopo City B, Seopopopopo City B, the victim E, a subcontractor, was working for the production of triang block under the management of the victim D Co., Ltd., the subcontractor, and the construction vehicle, such as ready-mixed, intended to enter the construction site for concrete typists necessary for the work.

At this time, the Defendant, along with F, etc. from the time to the 14:43 day of the same day, connected with F and G at the entrance of a five-minute H, and obstructed the construction vehicle from leaving the construction site by means of butti.

As a result, the Defendant, in collaboration with F, made it difficult for F to operate construction vehicles, such as 5-minuted vehicles by force, thereby hindering the construction work of D Co., Ltd., a private victim D Co., Ltd. and E, a partner company.

2. On April 15, 2013, at the construction site located in Seopopopo City B around 12:43 on April 15, 2013, the victim E Co., Ltd., the subcontractor, was working for the production of triang block under the management of the victim D Co., Ltd., the subcontractor, and the construction vehicle, such as ready-mixed, intended to enter the construction site for concrete building building necessary for the work.

At this time, the Defendant, from the time to 12:50 on the same day, 7 minutes at the entrance of H from the same day with I, had obstructed vehicles from leaving the construction site by means of Burti.

As a result, the defendant, in collaboration with I, has obstructed the construction work of the victim E Co., Ltd., a private victim D Co., Ltd., a partner company, by making it difficult to operate construction vehicles such as 7-minuted ready-mixed vehicles by force.

3. On April 16, 2013, at the construction site located in Seopo-si B, Seopopopo-si B, and the victim KK corporation, a partner company, was engaged in the manufacture of walls for the victim J corporation, and the construction vehicle, such as ready-mixed, tried to enter the construction site for concrete building works necessary for the work.

arrow