1. The incidental appeal by the plaintiff C shall be dismissed.

2. Of the judgment of the first instance court, with respect to the Defendant A and B, the following:

Plaintiff

C’s incidental appeal was lawful, and the Defendant did not file an appeal against Plaintiff A and B, and the judgment of the first instance court against Plaintiff C became final and conclusive on November 25, 2014, which is the expiration date of the appeal period.

Therefore, the incidental appeal by the plaintiff C is unlawful, so it is dismissed.

On November 30, 2013, around 19:57, the Defendant’s recognition of the Defendant’s liability for damages against Plaintiff A and B (hereinafter “instant Maritime Vehicle”) driven by the Eystynael taxi (hereinafter “instant Maritime Vehicle”) and continued two-lanes of the two-lane roads in front of Hyundai Apartment 104, Dong-gu Daejeon, Daejeon, along the human-dynamic distance outflow from the Ethndong street flood. On the left side of the road, the Defendant discovered and immediately turned back the F, which was crossing the road without permission from the left side of the instant Maritime Vehicle, but the Defendant suffered injury, such as bovine spongiformiform, cerebriformiform, etc., upon receiving the F from the front part of the right side of the instant Maritime Vehicle as the latter part of the instant Maritime Vehicle.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). F (hereinafter referred to as “the deceased”) died on December 4, 2013 while being under medical treatment.

A crosswalk was located in approximately 29 meters away from the location of the accident of this case from the location of the accident of this case.

At the time of the instant accident, the driver of the vehicle driven with the first line was found to have discovered the deceased and suspended in advance before the point of the instant accident, and did not shock the deceased.

As a result of the death of the deceased, the Plaintiff A and G jointly inherited the deceased’s property by 1/2.

The Defendant is a mutual aid business entity that has entered into a mutual aid agreement for the instant Maritime Vehicle.

【In light of the fact that there has been no dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, 6, and 7 (including paper numbers, hereinafter the same), and the result of the accident video verification conducted by this court, and the above facts of recognition as the ground for the purport of the entire pleadings, the accident in this case occurred due to the negligence of failure to detect the deceased in a timely manner, and thus, the defendant should be deemed to have caused the accident in this case.