1. The Defendant: (a) against Plaintiff A and B, KRW 65,565,468, and KRW 2,00,000 for each of the said money; and (b) on November 30, 2013 for each of the said money.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. At around 19:57 on November 30, 2013, D rocketing taxi (hereinafter “instant Maritime Vehicle”)

) A person driving his/her car and driving his/her car along the two-lanes of Hyundai Apartment 104, the two-lanes in front of the Hyundai Apartment 104, Dong-gu, Daejeon, along the two-lanes from the efficial distance room. On the left side of the proceeding, he/she found the F that he/she was crossing the road without permission on the right side from the left side of the road and applied it rapidly, but he/she did not reach such a part as the upper part of the vehicle in question, thereby suffering from injury, such as efficiencies and efficiencies. F (hereinafter referred to as “the deceased”).

(2) On December 4, 2013, while being under treatment, the brain-related accident was killed as the marina for brain training (hereinafter “instant accident”).

(2) There were crosswalks at approximately about 29 meters away from the point of the instant accident to the sloping distance.

At the time of the instant accident, the driver of the vehicle driven with the first line was found to have discovered the deceased and suspended in advance before the point of the instant accident, and did not shock the deceased.

3) As the Deceased died of the instant accident, the Plaintiff A and G jointly inherited the deceased’s property. The Plaintiff C is the mother of the Deceased. 4) The Defendant is a mutual aid business entity that entered into a mutual aid agreement with respect to the instant vehicle.

[Ground of Recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap 1 to 3, 6, and 7 evidence (including paper numbers), the result of the verification of the accident video of this court, the purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the above facts of recognition of liability, the accident of this case was caused by the negligence of driving a vehicle without properly examining D's prior bank. Thus, the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiffs for the damages suffered by the accident of this case as a mutual aid business operator of the A's marine vehicle of this case.

(c) Evidence A 3, Evidence A 6-4, Evidence A 7-2, Evidence B 1-3, and the whole purport of the pleadings as a result of the accident video verification conducted by this Court.