logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2015.05.14 2013가단238627
손해배상(자)
Text

1. The Defendants jointly deal with Plaintiff A with KRW 55,171,200, Plaintiff B, and C respectively, and each of the said amounts.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. The facts of recognition (1) around 18:50 on May 1, 2012, Defendant E driven a F-Wurt Transporting Vehicle and proceeded at a speed of about 60 kilometers from the passenger terminal at a speed of 3 lanes in front of Samsung Apartment apartment, which is located in the Jung-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, along with three-lanes, at a speed of about 60 kilometers from the passenger terminal. As such, there is a vehicle signal light and pedestrian signal, etc. installed at the crosswalk, Defendant E was negligent in checking whether there is a pedestrian on the crosswalk, and without any duty of care to safely drive the crosswalk in accordance with the new subparagraph, Defendant E failed to discover the network G (hereinafter referred to as “the network”), which was driven along the red signal of the vehicle, and caused the deceased to die with the front-hander of the vehicle and the part of the bus, and caused the deceased to die at the expense of the vehicle in front and the end of May 8, 2012.

(2) The Plaintiff A is the deceased’s wife, and the Plaintiff B and C inherited the deceased as the deceased’s children.

(Inheritance Rate A, B, and C = 3:2.2.3) Defendant D is the owner of the instant vehicle involved in the instant accident, and Defendant E was in de facto marital relationship with Defendant D’s wife H at the time of the instant accident.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, Gap evidence No. 8, Eul evidence Nos. 2 through 8, video (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the facts of recognition as the basis of liability, Defendant D is the owner of the instant accident vehicle, who is an operator under Article 3 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, and Defendant E is jointly liable to compensate the Plaintiffs for all damages.

2. Except as otherwise stated below within the scope of liability for damages, it shall be as stated in the separate list of damages calculation.

arrow