logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2017.12.01 2017고단1024
특정경제범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(수재등)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months and a fine for 6,00,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From around 2013, the Defendant was in charge of all loan operations at the head office of the E Bank located in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si, as the team leader of the loan team. The Defendant was introduced from the branch office around May 2014 and was aware of F from around 2014.

No executive or employee of a financial company, etc. shall accept, request, or promise any money, valuables, or other benefits in connection with his/her duties.

On May 2014 and June 2015, the Defendant was aware of the fact that the Defendant, at the above E Bank head office of the above E Bank, consulted F with the effect that it is difficult to provide loans due to the lack of resolution of the problems such as the sales price with the landowners of the land scheduled for re-building, and that F was already consulted with other banks to take out loans, but all of the loans were refused.

Nevertheless, the Defendant would allow F to receive KRW 4.2 billion of the PF loan if he/she had to pay to F on June 2015, 2015.

In the end, “if a loan is made, 3% of the fee shall be changed” and “F shall give advice on the preparation of loan-related documents, etc. from that time to that time, and shall make loans related to the reconstruction project at the above E bank-related coffee shop around July 2015 on the day before that day.

Around September 2015, F received KRW 1 million from F in cash; F prepared loan-related data on the road near the head office of the said E Bank; F was granted KRW 1 million from F in cash; and F was granted from F around September 2015, 2015 to F prior to the number of houses near the head office of the said E Bank; and was granted KRW 1 million from F in cash.

Accordingly, the defendant demanded money and valuables in relation to his duties as an officer or employee of a financial company.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's partial statement in court;

arrow