Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 100,000.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, at the request of the victim C(66 tax) in 1997, transported the 100cc-Jato-Jato-Jato-Jato-Jato-Jato-Jato-Jato-Jato-Jato-Jato-Pato-Jato-Jato-Pato-Jato-Pato-Pato-Pato-Pato-Jato-Pato-Jato

Therefore, in 2014, the defendant lent the off-to-land to the victim who owns the off-to-land of the Dong in 2014, and the defective victim borrowed the off-to-land to transport the off-to-land and stored and used it.

On April 2015, the Defendant continued to use it without return to the Defendant, and the Defendant kept it in custody in the E Village in front of his house at the time of the breakdown of the Orala, the Defendant issued and disposed of it without the consent of the victim at the place on November 1, 2016.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Witness C and each testimony of F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the register of two-wheeled automobiles;

1. Article 355 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 355 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. In this case, Article 334, Paragraph 1 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and Article 334, the reasons for conviction and sentencing, and the statement of the defendant and the injured party, the witness F, a third party, returned from this Court, “The defendant is owned by Oralab Co., Ltd.”.

Due to the fact that the Defendant stated to the effect that “A” is the ownership of C at the time when the Defendant made the judgment, it seems that he was aware that C was the ownership of Obane at the time of giving F, thereby recognizing guilty.

However, the judgment of the court below is that C has purchased KRW 100,000 prior to two (2) years prior to the crime, and the defendant seems to have little property value at the time of the crime, and the defendant is also deemed to have no property value at the time of the crime and delivered it to F merely.