Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for eight months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a B-Wood vehicle.

On July 24, 2014, the Defendant driven the above car on July 24, 2014, and proceeded at the speed of 20km (the principal’s statement) at the speed of 13km (20km) in front of the Seoul Science Investigation and Investigation Institute, which is located in 139, Yangcheon-gu Seoul, Yangcheon-gu, Seoul.

Since there are crosswalks where signal lights are installed on the front side, there was a duty of care to check whether a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a road to reduce speed and to see well the right and the right and the right of the motor vehicle and to drive the motor vehicle safely.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and caused the victim C's left-hand side, which passed the crosswalk from the right-hand side of the defendant's running direction to the left-hand side, to the right-hand side of the above car, according to the Mad Green Pedestrian Signals, which was progress as it is, by negligence, even though it was a red stop signal.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as the 10-day pressure frame, which requires approximately eight weeks of treatment, due to such occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement prepared in C;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3 (1), the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (1) 1 and 6 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the Selection of Imprisonment without prison labor for a crime;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act [the scope of recommendation] general traffic accident area (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act) where illegality in the proviso of Article 3 (2) of the Specialized School Act (Article 3 (2) of the Specialized School Act (Article 3 (3) of the Specific School Act) is serious in terms of the defendant's negligence and degree of damage, etc.