The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment without prison labor for not less than five months and one year of suspended execution) that the court below sentenced against the defendant is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the defendant agreed with the victim that the agreement was submitted is favorable.

However, the crime of this case is limited to the liability for the crime of this case because the defendant shocked the victim on the crosswalk along the pedestrian signal and inflicted an injury that requires about nine weeks medical treatment. The crime of this case is limited to the scope of the recommended sentence according to the sentencing guidelines established by the Supreme Court's Sentencing Committee, the traffic crime group of the general traffic accident, the first type of the traffic accident (the injury caused by traffic accident), the special spons (the penalty is not imposed, the illegality in the proviso of Article 3 (2) of the Act on the Special Cases of School, the decision of the recommended area (the basic area), the scope of the recommended sentence ( April to 10), the suspended sentence/the suspended sentence (the principal negative reason: the punishment penalty is not imposed, and no criminal punishment is imposed), and the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence before and after the crime, the defendant's assertion that the defendant's punishment against the defendant is too inappropriate and unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.