logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 포항지원 2014.07.16 2014고정248
업무방해
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,00, and by a fine of KRW 2,500,000, respectively.

The Defendants respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who resides in Northern-gu D at the port of entry, and Defendant B is a person who resides in E.

From May 20 to May 20, 2013, the victim F (the age of 68) newly built the studio G called G, which is adjacent to the Defendants’ house. The Defendants were suffering from the construction of noise and dust, etc., resulting in a sense that they will interfere with the victim’s construction.

1. Defendant A

A. On July 12, 2013, the Defendant committed the crime from around 15:00 to around 17:00 on July 12, 2013, 2013, the Defendant obstructed the victim F’s studio construction work by force for a period of two hours by preventing access to the construction site by blocking access roads to the construction site with Hmasaw car owned by the Defendant at the front of the said studio construction site.

B. Around July 20, 2013, the Defendant committed the crime: (a) from around 16:00 to around 17:00 on July 20, 2013 to around 17:00 on the same day, the Defendant obstructed the victim F’s studio construction work by force for about one hour, by blocking access roads to the construction site with a shower car at the same place as the preceding paragraph from around 16:0 to around 17:00 on the same day.

C. On August 15, 2013, the Defendant committed the crime at around 07:00 on August 15, 2013, the Defendant interfered with the victim F’s studio construction work by force by removing the code of electric measuring instruments connected to the front poles of the construction site for the construction of water pipes at the same place as the preceding paragraph at the construction site.

2. Defendant B

A. From around 17:00 on July 20, 2013 to 18:00 on the same day, the Defendant obstructed the victim F’s studio construction work by force by failing to enter a studio vehicle by means of blocking access roads at the front of the construction site of the said studio-type construction site by sitting down at the front of the said studio-type construction site.

B. The Defendant, at the same time and place as in the preceding paragraph, has obstructed the works of the Victim F, and when the victim demanded her f to turn on the road at the same time and place as in the preceding paragraph, saying, “the victim must do so,” and said, “the victim shall do so.”

arrow