Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. Around 11:00 on April 22, 2013, the Defendant, at the front of the new construction site of the Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Office Officetel, argued with the victim D (the age of 50) on the issue that the Defendant, a contractor, did not prepare a subcontract agreement for the structural construction project in front of the new construction site of the officetel in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government. On the other hand, the Defendant abused the victim’s bat with his bat, etc. on two hand.
2. This part of the facts charged is a crime falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s explicit intent pursuant to Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. Since the above victim submitted an agreement to the effect that the above victim does not wish to punish the defendant on or around December 13, 2013, the prosecution of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.