Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The summary of the facts charged is the person who is engaged in agency business for parking in B (State).
On August 16, 2013, at around 13:40 on August 16, 2013, the Defendant neglected to take the front direction while driving the said vehicle while driving the said vehicle on behalf of the owner of the Da SM5 passenger vehicle, and by negligence, passed the road on the left side from the direction of the operation of the said vehicle to the left side of the victim E (ma, 70 years old) was driven by the Defendant as the front front wheels of the said vehicle.
The Defendant suffered from the injury of the victim, such as cutting the frame and closing of a 5-year aggregate on the right side, which requires approximately six weeks of treatment due to such occupational negligence.
2. This part of the facts charged is a crime falling under Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent pursuant to Article 268(2) of the Criminal Act. Since the above victim submitted a written withdrawal of complaint around November 8, 2013, which was the date of the instant indictment, to the effect that the victim did not wish to punish the defendant, the instant indictment is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparag. 6