All of the prosecutions of this case are dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged:

A. On May 14, 2013, at around 14:40, the victim was able to walk up the right-hand bridge of the victim who is going to undergo a eromatic surgery, on the ground that the victim was able to walk up a eromatic disease in front of the exit room of the victim B (56 years of age, women) in front of the exit room opened at Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, on the ground that the victim was able to do so.

B. In the same date, at the same time and place, the victim C (the 49-year old, South) expressed an intent to “absatising a dog, satising, satisf,” without any justifiable reason, and assaulted by hand the victim’s flab and bladle.

2. The facts charged in this part of the judgment are crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s explicit intent pursuant to Article 260(3) of the same Act. Since the above victims submitted an agreement or a written withdrawal of complaint to the effect that the above victims do not wish to punish the defendant around May 30, 2013, the indictment in this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.