logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.11.18 2015고단3557
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 8, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor and four months in Busan District Court on the embezzlement of stolen objects, etc. on January 8, 2014, and the Defendant completed the execution of the sentence in the first prison of North Korean defectors on April 18, 2015.

"2015 Highest 3557"

1. On May 1, 2015, the Defendant, on May 22:23, 2015, found one copy of the Nonghyup C’s cream card lost by the victim C from the front stairs of the Nonghyup-dong branch located in Busan Jin-gu, Busan, Busan, and 257-42.

The Defendant did not follow necessary procedures, such as returning the e-mail card acquired as above to the victim, but did so.

Accordingly, the defendant embezzled the property that has been separated from the possession of the victim.

2. On May 1, 2015, at around 22:38, 2015, the Defendant presented the e-mail card acquired as stated in the above paragraph (1) to an employee who is unable to know the name at the “E-mail store” located in Busan, Jin-gu, Busan, as if he were the Defendant’s card, and had the employee pay the amount of goods equivalent to KRW 8,800 with the above e-mail card.

In addition, the Defendant acquired a total of KRW 1,139,733 by using a check card owned by C over 60 times, such as the list of crimes in attached Form 1(1).

3. The Defendant violated the Specialized Credit Financial Business Act, at the same place as the above 2 paragraph (2), used the check card in the above C’s name.

"2015 Highest 3925"

1. On May 18, 2015, the Defendant acquired one copy of the Busan Bank Cream Card, which was lost by the Victim F before the cash withdrawal at the Busan Bank's Docheon-ro 63 located in the Busan Bank, Seocheon-gu, Busan, Busan, on May 18, 2015.

The Defendant did not follow necessary procedures, such as returning the e-mail card acquired as above to the victim, but did so.

Accordingly, the defendant embezzled the property that has been separated from the possession of the victim.

2. The Defendant who violated the Fraudulent Act or the Specialized Credit Finance Business Act.

arrow