logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2018. 02. 28. 선고 2017두70403 판결
(심리불속행)과세유흥장소로 개별소비세 과세대상에 해당함[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court-2017-Nu-5321 ( October 13, 2017)

Title

(B) A taxable entertainment place subject to the individual consumption tax;

Summary

(B) The instant business establishment is a taxable entertainment place which is a taxable entertainment place provided by the Individual Consumption Tax Act, in which alcoholic beverages are sold to the main liquor, and entertainment facilities are installed, and the alcoholic beverages are allowed to dance while drinking alcoholic beverages with stage equipment, etc.

Related statutes

Article 2 of the Individual Consumption Tax Act

Cases

Supreme Court Decision 2017Du70403 Decided the imposition of individual consumption tax

Plaintiff-Appellant

AAA et al. 2

Defendant-Appellee

○○ Head of Regional Tax Office and 2

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 2017Nu55321 Decided October 13, 2017

Imposition of Judgment

February 28, 2018

Text

All appeals are dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Judgment of the lower court

The Appellants’ grounds of appeal on the grounds of appeal are examined as well as the records of this case.

The argument about the appeal procedure does not include the reasons prescribed in the subparagraphs of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Procedure of Appeal.

Since it is deemed that there is no reason or reason, all appeals are dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the same Act.

It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

arrow