logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2016. 10. 27. 선고 2016두45820 판결
(심리불속행)개별소비세법상의 개별소비세 부과대상 장소인 과세유흥장소에 해당함[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court 2015Nu71022 (No. 28, 2016)

Title

(S) The taxable entertaining places which are places subject to the imposition of the individual consumption tax under the Individual Consumption Tax Act are concerned.

Summary

The issue of whether the individual consumption tax is a taxable entertainment place is mainly a business that mainly prepares and sells alcoholic beverages, has workers engaged in entertainment or install entertainment facilities, and customers are determined depending on whether they are allowed to sing or dance.

Related statutes

Article 1 of the Individual Consumption Tax Act

Cases

Revocation of individual consumption tax

Plaintiff-Appellant

○ ○

Defendant-Appellee

Head of Mapo Tax Office

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court 2015Nu71022 ( June 28, 2016)

Imposition of Judgment

October 27, 2016

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

The records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined. However, the grounds of appeal on the grounds of appeal do not include the grounds provided in each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal of Supreme Court or are without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

arrow